WebApr 15, 2008 · RB v FB & MA [2008] EWHC 1436 (Fam) Judgment arising from wardship of a child who held dual Pakistani and British passports and sought the assistance of the British High Commission when faced with the prospect of a forced marriage. The subject of the case was a 15 year old Pakistani who had lived all her life in Pakistan. WebJan 29, 2008 · VB v JP [2008] EWHC 112 (Fam) (29 January 2008) Links to this case Content referring to this case We are experiencing technical difficulties. Please contact Technical Support at +44 345 600 9355 for assistance. Resource Type Case page Court High Court Division Family Date 29 January 2008 Jurisdiction of court England and Wales …
Richard Beddoe - Coram Chambers
Web01 April 2008 Appeal history None CJEU's case law cited by the court None Summary The English legal proceedings were seeking the recognition and enforcement of a Spanish contact order. The proceedings were first commenced by the father on 8th December 2004. A registration order was made by Munby J. WebMar 17, 2008 · McCartney v Mills McCartney [2008] EWHC 401 (Fam) (17 March 2008) Links to this case Westlaw UK Bailii Content referring to this case We are experiencing technical difficulties. Please contact Technical Support at +44 345 600 9355 for assistance. Resource Type Case page Court 772 Division Family Date 17 March 2008 Jurisdiction of court ctdot traffic data
SB v RB and AM and Others: FD 23 Apr 2008 - swarb.co.uk
WebJul 28, 2024 · SB v RB and AM and Others: FD 23 Apr 2008 Judges: Sumner J Citations: [2008] EWHC 938 (Fam), [2008] 2 FLR 1588, [2008] Fam Law 982 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: … WebMar 18, 2008 · 1. On 18 March 2008 there was a short hearing in this matter. It concerned SB who is 12 years old, DOB 11.6.95. Her parents married in Bangladesh in 1993. Her … WebMostyn J followed his own decision in DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam), again disagreeing with the approach of Holman J as indicated in Luckwell v Limata [2014] EWHC 502 (Fam), in finding that the default position was one of privacy and the press should justify in each case why the “core privacy” should breached. However he stated that his decision only related … ct dot special provision